The New Worker
The Weekly paper of the New Communist Party of Britain
Week commencing 1st December 2006
Welcome To Our Weekly Digest Edition
Please feel free to use this material provided the New Worker
CAN SHOVE HIS TRIDENT...
by Daphne Liddle
PRIME MINISTER Tony Blair last Thursday, 24th November,
railroaded his Cabinet into supporting his plans for a full replacement
for the ageing Trident nuclear missile system.
The full plans will be published in a White Paper in December and then
after three months “public debate”, Labour MPs will be ordered to vote
in favour of it. Since the Tories are likely to back it, Blair is
confident the weapons upgrade will be rubber-stamped and the “public
debate” is just a cosmetic exercise.
The cost of the new American-made submarine-based system will be
at least £25 billion – it was the most expensive of several
options. But, unlike other public expenditure, it has the blessing of
Chancellor Gordon Brown and the Treasury.
Not all the Cabinet were happy about Blair’s plans; one
complained: “The PM is determined to force this through and there is
little we can do to stop him. It’s a bounce. It’s just a pity we
couldn’t debate the issue.”
That is nonsense. There is plenty they could do to stop him. They
could show a little backbone and resign, as Robin Cook did in protest
at the start of the illegal war against Iraq. Blair’s government is
already weak; a handful of high-up resignations would stop him. These
people are more concerned about their careers than about preventing a
Hans Blix, the former United Nations weapons inspector who crossed
swords in the run up to the attack on Iraq over claims about Iraq’s
alleged weapons of mass destruction, attacked Blair’s decision in a
speech to the British Institute of International and Comparative Law in
London last Monday.
He warned that upgrading Britain’s nuclear arsenal will put the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) under “strain” and cause
resentment among non-nuclear countries.
Blix also attacked other members of the UN Security Council for
failing in their obligations under the NPT by not doing more to
eliminate their own nuclear arsenals.
He told the meeting that his Stockholm-based WDM Commission has
proposed that the UN General Assembly should call a world summit on
disarmament to revive the NPT and reduce the risk of a nuclear war.
The Commission, Dr Blix said, believes that top priority should
be given to ratification of a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty,
including the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Blix has supports on Labour’s backbenches, including Walthamstow
MP Neil Gerrard, Leyton and Wanstead MP Harry Cohen, and North Bury MP
David Chaytor, who are among 30 or so MPs who are warning their
leadership that replacing Trident would breach the terms of the NPT.
Neil Gerrard said: “Dr Blix was proved right on WMD and a lot of
people will agree with what he is saying now. It is possible that Mr
Blair will lose a majority of Labour MPs on this issue.”
Jack Straw, now demoted to Leader of the Commons, has defended
Blair’s decision to impose a three-line whip requiring Labour MPs to
support the Government decision. He claimed: “This is about the defence
of this country and its people and its future over many decades. We
have a responsibility not to cop out on this.”
But he failed to make it clear how a new nuclear weapons system
would make Britain safer – especially a system which is not independent
at all and could only be used with the permission of the United States,
which itself poses the biggest threat to nuclear war.
Harry Cohen challenged Straw’s assessment of the dangers facing
Britain, saying they would make the White Paper another “dodgy dossier”
like the one ahead of the Iraq War.
Kate Hudson, speaking on behalf of CND, said: “The Government
must consider all the options for Britain’s future security, including
acting on our commitment to multilateral negotiations for nuclear
disarmament under the NPT.”
Meanwhile CND members and other peace activists throughout
Britain are preparing for lengthy sieges of nuclear bases like Faslane
in Scotland and Aldermaston in Berkshire.
NORTH of the border Labour’s
dinosaurs are gearing up for next year’s Scottish parliamentary
elections with a string of attacks on the Scottish National Party (SNP)
from Prime Minister Tony Blair, Chancellor Gordon Brown and Home
Secretary John Reid. They have quite rightly concluded that increasing
numbers of Scottish voters are thinking of deserting Labour. They know
that many of Labour’s traditional working class supporters are angry at
the Government’s support for the invasion and occupation of Iraq and
that many Scots have been equally disappointed at Labour’s continued
commitment to reactionary Thatcherite policies in the national and
Knowing that the Nationalists and the Scottish
Liberal Democrats are eager to garner the protest vote following the
collapse of the Scottish Socialist Party, and fearful to take the
Lib/Dems – their coalition partners in the Scottish government – head
on, Scottish Labour has chosen to make the SNP the bogeyman of their
Instead of trying to woo Scottish workers back with a manifesto
committed to reform and social progress, Labour’s leaders have
bizarrely chosen to challenge the Scottish Nationalists on the SNP’s
own agenda, using the clapped-out arguments of the Tories in an attempt
to divert the electorate away from their own failures and betrayals.
It’s all very well for Reid to claim that the SNP
are unfit to face the great challenges of the coming decades and to
argue that international terrorism, organised crime, mass migration and
the environment do not stop at the border. But reducing the argument to
talk of “border guards” at Gretna Green and the numbers of Scots with
relatives in England was an insult to the intelligence of the Scottish
people. And claiming that the “true liberation” of Scotland lies
solely through “education” showed a lack of imagination and a contempt
for the voters that will surely rebound on the Scottish Labour Party
next spring if it carries on this way.
Though the SNP supported the establishment of the
autonomous Scottish government, they have campaigned for full Scottish
independence since their foundation in 1934. The SNP supported the
campaign for devolution, which began in the 1970s, as a step in the
right direction. But what they never acknowledge is that the campaign
for a Scottish parliament only succeeded when its demands were embraced
by the Scottish labour movement which led to its establishment by the
Labour Government in 1999.
The New Communist Party has long recognised the rights of the Scottish
nation to full national self-determination. We support Scottish demands
for the right to preserve and develop their culture and national
identity. We support their right to possess and control all the
physical and other resources present on their land or in their
territorial waters. We acknowledge the honourable role of the SNP and
the Scottish Liberal Democrats in campaigning against the war in Iraq
but we also recognise that these bourgeois parties can never represent
or defend the interests of the Scottish working class.
The Scottish Nationalists and the Scottish Liberal Democrats do not
represent the interests of the working class or the trade union
movement. The Scottish Labour Party is still the party of organised
labour and it still relies on the unions for most of its funds.
Only the labour movement in Scotland, England and Wales can defeat
Blair and his cronies. Only the organised working class can reclaim
Labour to implement democratic reforms, restore the public sector and
the “welfare state” and only the Scottish working class can lead the
Scottish people to genuine independence and popular democracy.
If you find these articles from the New Worker
Online interesting and useful them why not subscribe to our print
edition with lots more news, features, and photos?
To the New Communist Party Page