The New Worker

The Weekly paper of the New Communist Party of Britain

Week commencing 17th February 2006




Protest against Islamophobia

Welcome To Our Weekly Digest Edition

Please feel free to use this material provided the New Worker is informed and credited.

Lead

BLAIR ON THE RUN

by Daphne Liddle

PRIME Minister Tony Blair has hardly shown his face to the public in Britain since last week’s Dunfermline and West Fife by-election, where the Liberal Democrats won the seat, overthrowing a substantial Labour majority.

The night before the election he had appeared in a ceremony involving all 354 Labour MPs in the House of Commons to mark the 100th anniversary of the Parliamentary Labour Party.

 At that event, Blair outrageously tried to claim the heritage of Keir Hardy and the Labour Party founders for his “New Labour”.

Hardy and the other 28 Labour MPs who took their seats in 1906 had a vision of liberating Britain’s working class from capitalist exploitation and delivering to them a fair and equal society where they enjoyed the full fruits of their labour.

 Blair and the other traitors who surround him are busy delivering the working class into further servitude to capitalism through continuing privatisation and undoing all the state welfare and education gains won by the Labour Party and other progressives over the last 100 years.

 The next day the people of Dunfermline sent a clear message of what they think of New Labour – a message that is likely to be repeated in coming local elections in May this year and in 2007.

 Blair did not show up for the Labour Party’s spring conference in Blackpool at the weekend. He ran off to South Africa and did not even come back for Monday night’s crucial vote in the Commons on the Identity Card Bill.
 
claimed

He claimed he was forced to turn back shortly after take-off because of engine trouble on his plane. But can we really believe there were no other flights or planes available to get him home on time?

 Since Dunfermline Blair seems to have left Chancellor Gordon Brown in sole charge of New Labour – even though Brown has more reason to be embarrassed about Dunfermline – it is where he lives; his own constituency is next door and he led Labour’s campaign in Dunfermline.

 Brown has emerged from Blair’s shadow to give long speeches on issues far beyond his Treasury remit – but especially on security and “anti-terrorism”. I doing so he has dashed any illusions that he would be a better prime minister than Blair.

 We have seen MPs like Clare Short and political commentators claiming that, while Blair is still Prime Minister, Brown has to toe the Blair line, and that once in power in his own right, Brown would formulate different policies. This is plainly wishful thinking.

 The removal of Blair will mark a defeat for his policies in the court of public opinion and for that reason it is important. But this will not stop Brown following exactly the same line because it is the line of the ruling class, dictated from Washington, from the G8, from the World Trade Organisation and other global ruling class power structures.

 The struggle will continue.

 At the Blackpool conference, Labour Party chair Ian McCartney accused backbench rebels of splitting the party and called for unity after the Dunfermline defeat and in the face of new-found Tory confidence under David Cameron.
 
brow-beating

We imagine a lot of behind-the-scenes brow-beating went on, with Brown and others shamelessly ratcheting up the anti-terror scar-emongering in the wake of the Danish cartoon protests and the Abu Hamza trial. Because on the Monday and the Wednesday the backbench rebellions disappeared and legislation on ID cards and outlawing the “glorification or terrorism” were passed – even with Blair in South Africa.

 Thus the heirs of Keir Hardy betrayed the whole British public by hastening the march of the on-coming fascism that is taking over the bourgeois British state.

 At least Brown makes it plain that the huge bureaucracy that will be needed will be open to the private sector – it is ultimately for their benefit. A lot of the work involved in compiling and maintaining the huge database needed for the ID card system will be done by the private sector with elected government becoming more and more marginalised and irrelevant – the ultimate corporate state. It will monitor our every move and influence our every action, not only for security but to ensure they wring every possible last penny out of us.

 We can stop this nightmare. It is vital right now that the succession of Brown into Blair’s shoes must not go unchallenged. Labour backbenchers must rediscover their courage. Even if they cannot defeat the Brown succession at this stage, they must not give away their power to object to it as loudly as possible.

 *************
Editorials

Another blow for Blair

LAST WEEK’S shock by-election defeat for Labour in Dunfermline and West Fife can only be the shape of things to come. The Liberal Democrats overturned a massive Labour majority with a 15 per cent swing in the Scottish constituency where Chancellor Gordon Brown lives, This is even more remarkable because it occurred during the middle of the Liberal’s own internal struggle to elect a new leader, following the acrimonious resignation of Charles Kennedy last month.

Thousands of Labour supporters sat on their hands while others clearly felt that the Lib-Dems were a more attractive alternative to the stale, anti-working class agenda of Blair & Co. Labour can expect more of the same at the hands of the Lib-Dems at the local elections this May if the movement doesn’t move quickly to dump Tony Blair and all he stands for.

The Dunfermline result has also been a bitter pill for those who believe that the answer is to build a new left social-democratic movement outside the Labour Party and without the mass support of the unions. The pathetic vote for the Scottish Socialist Party, a sprig of the old Trotskyist Militant Tendency, proves once again that there’s no place for two social-democratic parties in national elections. Though the SSP is probably the biggest left social-democratic party in Britain with six seats in the Scottish Parliament, it still only managed to garner 537 votes or 1.6 per cent of the vote in last week’s by-election.

Blair’s aides are trying to spin a victory out of this colossal Scottish vote of no-confidence by claiming the election was fought on local issues and that their defeat had nothing to do with the war in Iraq. But there’s little doubt that the Lib-Dems opposition to the war has played a major part in their current resurgence.

But the Lib-Dems are not a real alternative to Labour. Apart from Iraq, the Liberals have nothing to offer working people. They reflect, in part, that section of the ruling class that wants Britain to be a full partner with Franco-German imperialism inside the European Union. They are a liberal bourgeois party that supported virtually all the repressive anti-union legislation of the Thatcher-Major era and they back most of the current schemes to sell-off what’s left of the public sector. Those of us unfortunate enough to live in a Lib-Dem controlled borough know that they are virtually indistinguishable from the Tories in practice.

The only alternative for working people is to defeat Blair and Brown and elect a democratic Labour leadership committed to carrying out the wishes of the unions and the millions who elected them three times in a row since 1997.

***********

Brutality in Basra


THE DISGUSTING video record of British soldiers beating Iraqi youths while another squaddie jeers and gloats as the boots go in comes as no surprise to us. Nor will it surprise the people of India, Cyprus, Aden, Ireland or anywhere else once occupied by British imperialism. Far from being the “isolated incident” the Ministry of Defence routinely claims, beating up civilian protesters is a normal part of British colonial practice.

There must be a full inquiry, not only to identify and punish the culprits, but also to unmask the officers who presumably order or turn a blind eye to the actions of the men under their command.

British troops, who claim to be “peace-keepers”, are not wanted in Iraq and the sooner they leave the better.

 Back to index


To the New Communist Party Page